Rules of argumentation for the utilization in persuasive essays
You need to use sufficient arguments and use them correctly if you want to write a good persuasive essay. Arguments must persuade the reader while making him alter his head or point of view.
Do you know the most elementary rules of giving arguments?
- 1. Run with simple, clear, precise and convincing principles, as persuasiveness can be simply “drowned” in a sea of terms and arguments, specially than he wants to show if they are unclear and inaccurate; the interlocutor “hears” or understands much less.
- 2. The manner and pace for the argument should match to your temperament of this author:
- arguments and proof, explained individually, are much more efficient in achieving the objective than if they are presented at one time;
- three to four bright arguments achieve a higher impact than numerous meaningless arguments;
- argumentation ought not to be declarative or look like a monologue for the “protagonist”;
- appropriate pauses often exert a higher influence compared to flow of words;
- the interlocutor is much better influenced by the active construction associated with expression compared to the passive with regards to proof (as an example, it is better to express “we will take action” than “can be achieved).
- 3. The reasoning must be proper with regards to the audience. It means:
- always openly admit rightness of this opinion that is opposite it is right, even though it could have unfavorable consequences for your needs. Thus giving your interlocutor the opportunity to expect exactly the same behavior through the opposing side. In addition, in so doing, you don’t break the ethics;
- it is advisable to try only using those arguments which is accepted because of the reader. Attempt to read him mind ahead of time and speak the same language;
- avoid phrases that are empty they suggest a weakening of attention and trigger unnecessary pauses so that you can gain some time get the lost thread associated with discussion (as an example, “as was said,” or custom writing “in other words,” “more or less,” “along with all the marked”, “It is possible and thus, and so”, “it had not been said”, etc.).
When providing arguments, perform some after
It is crucial to adjust arguments to your person associated with the reader, ie:
- build arguments in line with the objectives and motives associated with interlocutor;
- keep in mind that “excessive” persuasiveness provokes rebuff from the subordinate, specially if he’s got an “aggressive” nature (the “boomerang” effect);
- avoid nondeval expressions and formulations making it hard to argue and understand;
- you will need to present into the employee whenever you can the data, tips and factors.
Recall the proverb: “It is better to see as soon as than hear one hundred times.” Bringing vivid comparisons and visual arguments, it is critical to understand that comparisons should always be in line with the experience of the reader, otherwise you will have no result, they need to support and bolster the author’s argumentation, be convincing, but without exaggeration and extremes that can cause the mistrust associated with performer and thereby put under question all of the parallels. And a lot of notably, you have to respect your reader and start to become truthful with him.
